Published on July 16, 2008 By Artysim In Current Events

So now restaurants in New York have to post the calorie counts of the food they're selling. As of friday, if they don't post these counts, they face a $ 2,000.0 fine. While many folks cry foul on the part of the evil government interfering with private business, I personally think this is absolutely wonderful!

Why? Because as a consumer, you should have the RIGHT to know what you're getting, especially when you're consuming it. Food isn't some consumer bauble that you buy for kicks, you actually need it to survive and so you should be given pertinent information on just what exactly you're buying.

The whole article is here, which I highly recommend you take a read;

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25464987/

Not surprisingly, many folks are utterly shocked at the calories packed into most restaurant food out there. In the article it states that many muffins and cookies at coffee shops contain upwards of 600 calories. That means if you were to eat 4 such cookies that'd be 2400 calories which is the average requirement for an adult in an entire day! Many consumers have remarked that it's no wonder obesity and overweight related issues and illnesses are so common in our society... because we're being overfed (and consequently) undernourished.

Further, it's not like we're asking the restaurant industry to dissect every detail about the food. We're not asking for sodium counts or cholesterol content, just plain old calories. The most basic yardstick a person can use to make an on the fly decision.

One thing I particularly enjoyed reading about was the shock many folks had when learning the calorie counts of many of the "healthy option" foods at restaurants.

The pecan-chicken salad at TGI Friday's packs more than 1300 calories, more than half of an adults entire daily requirements! And it's even more calories than their cheeseburger-and-fries option!

Other gems are many of the options at several franchise steakhouses, with some items going over 2,000 calories and desserts upwards of 1,500 calories. That's in a single serving. I suppose if you're only having one meal in the entire day you'd be good to go off of that, but that is not the case for most of us.

Every year nearly 300,000 people in America die of obesity and overweight related illnesses. Enacting a law that forces restaurants to inform their customers just exactly what they're putting into their bodies is indeed a step in the right direction!


Comments (Page 1)
4 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Jul 16, 2008
And here we will disagree. if you want to know what is in your food, cook it yourself. We dont need government telling us what we can and cannot eat.
on Jul 16, 2008

We dont need government telling us what we can and cannot eat.
  They are not saying what you can and cannot eat, they just want people to be educated about what exactly they are eating and the choices they are making.  Obesity costs the government money.  I don't see this as being any different than a seat belt law etc. 

I know that if I read labels, I change my eating habits.  It's one thing to cluelessly eat a delicious hamburger.  It's another thing to know that that hamburger has 1200 calories and I really need to cut back the rest of the day if I choose to order that.  I have no problem with the requirement. 

on Jul 16, 2008

I don't see anything wrong with such a law at all. I mean, what's so bad wrong about layin' out the truth to people?

on Jul 17, 2008
Obesity costs the government money.


That is a myth. Like smoking, the government makes money off of health problems. How? People die younger so they draw less SS. And in addition, their vices are heavily taxed. When government taxes a vice to support a virtue, they must support the vice to continue to fund the virtue. The biggest proponent of smoking is not Big Tobacco, it is Big Government.

And it is NOT government's business what we eat. Again the road to hell. Several years ago it was paved with Poly unsaturated fats. So they changed to Trans fats. Guess what?

Tomorrow it will be hydrogenated fats or some such other nonsense.

If you want to know what is in your food, cook it yourself.
on Jul 17, 2008
I think providing the calorie content is good in terms of giving people the ability to chose based on what daily diet they chose to be in. But it has always been my belief that if people go to places not concerning themselves over what they eat, are ignorant on purpose (as in not bothering to research with so many places to find information) as to what they may be consuming, then it's their fault. One has the option to request for a list of calories. But if the restaurant cant provide it, they have the option to eat somewhere else.

This to me, while a good thing in a why, it takes away the motivation to self educate yourself. Again, leaning towards making people lazier by removing the motivation to educate themselves. I like making my life easier, but if we gonna go this far as to taking away any motivation that would help people educate themselves more, we may as well give everyone a gadget with every answer to every question possible, that way no one will need to learn anything.
on Jul 17, 2008
And it is NOT government's business what we eat.
But government isn't regulating what you eat, just requiring nutrition information. All the packaged food you buy in the grocery store has nutrition information. Does that bother you? Why should having nutrition information on restaurant food be a problem?

on Jul 17, 2008

That is a myth. Like smoking, the government makes money off of health problems. How? People die younger so they draw less SS. And in addition, their vices are heavily taxed. When government taxes a vice to support a virtue, they must support the vice to continue to fund the virtue. The biggest proponent of smoking is not Big Tobacco, it is Big Government.

In some ways I agree with you on this. One issue that I have very mixed feelings on in my home province is video lottery terminals. These are gambling machines in bars all over the place that you can easily drop thousands of dollars into if you so choose and are very addictive. They have indeed ruined many a life! However, the provincial government (same deal as a state government) doesn't want to get rid of or limit them because it's a huge cash cow.

Anywho. My main emphasis is the utter shock many folks have when they realize just how many calories they're taking in during a single meal at many restaurants. What I find especially interesting are the folks who believe that because they spent an hour or two walking around a mall or park (maybe burning a couple hundred calories) that that suddenly means they can eat a 2,000 calorie dinner... with other meals throughout the day too... thinking that they've 'worked it off'. I'm not saying this to belittle or criticize these people, it's just that they really don't know how much their bodies need vs how much they're actually taking in!

With this law in New York passed more folks will have that opportunity to understand a little more about the food they're eating. Hopefully this law will be enacted in other places too!

on Jul 17, 2008
Heh, you're over-estimating the calories most women need (I know you said avg "person" and didn't dictate gender). Two cookies could do some women in for the day, three would probably knock out the rest of us.

I don't understand why anyone would have a problem with this AT ALL.

When you purchase food at a store, the manufacturer is required by law to provide nutritional information (with some exceptions). How is this any different?

on Jul 17, 2008
But government isn't regulating what you eat, just requiring nutrition information.


I never said "regulate" I said "what". It still is not. The government is not your nanny. We are adults and should start acting like them instead of spoiled children.
on Jul 17, 2008
Consumers have a right to make informed choices. Point blank.
on Jul 17, 2008
What I find especially interesting are the folks who believe that because they spent an hour or two walking around a mall or park (maybe burning a couple hundred calories) that that suddenly means they can eat a 2,000 calorie dinner... with other meals throughout the day too... thinking that they've 'worked it off'.


I agree. I just dont agree with:

With this law in New York passed


More laws because of stupid people.
on Jul 17, 2008
Consumers have a right to make informed choices. Point blank.


Is there a law against being informed? I am unaware of it. I guess Google is an outlaw site now as well.
on Jul 17, 2008
Dr.Guy, I think you're being intentionally obtuse.

How are you going to google the calorie content for restaurant food items if the restaurant does not publish it or make it known in some way? It's not informed consent if the information needed to make an informed choice is unavailable.

This is essentially just an extension of the existing law regarding nutrition facts.

on Jul 17, 2008
Consumers have a right to make informed choices. Point blank.


True, but consumers also have the right to educate themselves to make informed choices. It's not like there is not enough information out there. But other than making people lazy to learn for themselves and the Govt being involved, I don't have much of a problem with this.

Lets be realistic here, if people truly cared about calories they would make it their business to educate themselves on what they eat. It's obvious places like McDonalds, Burger King and KFC (that's Kentucky Fried Chicken, not our JU member) are not the place to eat when it comes to calories, even if they offered low calorie stuff. It's also obvious, if you are educated enough, that certain types of foods could contain large amounts of calories (unless advised by the restaurant in their menu) so really this is more or just being plain lazy to me.

I have to agree with DrGuy on this. It's not about providing the information, it's about the Govt being involved in it.
on Jul 17, 2008
True, but consumers also have the right to educate themselves to make informed choices


Thank you for stating it so clearly. Apparently some are under the impression that it is against the law to inform yourself and only the government is allowed to do that now.
4 Pages1 2 3  Last