Published on October 1, 2008 By Artysim In Politics

A letter from Michael Moore, on his website here-

http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=237

Because, well, I think it's interesting, and I know he gets people's blood boiling on this site!!

neener neener,

Artysim

Friends,

The richest 400 Americans -- that's right, just four hundred people -- own MORE than the bottom 150 million Americans combined. 400 rich Americans have got more stashed away than half the entire country! Their combined net worth is $1.6 trillion. During the eight years of the Bush Administration, their wealth has increased by nearly $700 billion -- the same amount that they are now demanding we give to them for the "bailout." Why don't they just spend the money they made under Bush to bail themselves out? They'd still have nearly a trillion dollars left over to spread amongst themselves!

Of course, they are not going to do that -- at least not voluntarily. George W. Bush was handed a $127 billion surplus when Bill Clinton left office. Because that money was OUR money and not his, he did what the rich prefer to do -- spend it and never look back. Now we have a $9.5 trillion debt. Why on earth would we even think of giving these robber barons any more of our money?

I would like to propose my own bailout plan. My suggestions, listed below, are predicated on the singular and simple belief that the rich must pull themselves up by their own platinum bootstraps. Sorry, fellows, but you drilled it into our heads one too many times: There... is... no... free... lunch. And thank you for encouraging us to hate people on welfare! So, there will be no handouts from us to you. The Senate, tonight, is going to try to rush their version of a "bailout" bill to a vote. They must be stopped. We did it on Monday with the House, and we can do it again today with the Senate.

It is clear, though, that we cannot simply keep protesting without proposing exactly what it is we think Congress should do. So, after consulting with a number of people smarter than Phil Gramm, here is my proposal, now known as "Mike's Rescue Plan." It has 10 simple, straightforward points. They are:

1. APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO CRIMINALLY INDICT ANYONE ON WALL STREET WHO KNOWINGLY CONTRIBUTED TO THIS COLLAPSE. Before any new money is expended, Congress must commit, by resolution, to criminally prosecute anyone who had anything to do with the attempted sacking of our economy. This means that anyone who committed insider trading, securities fraud or any action that helped bring about this collapse must go to jail. This Congress must call for a Special Prosecutor who will vigorously go after everyone who created the mess, and anyone else who attempts to scam the public in the future.

2. THE RICH MUST PAY FOR THEIR OWN BAILOUT. They may have to live in 5 houses instead of 7. They may have to drive 9 cars instead of 13. The chef for their mini-terriers may have to be reassigned. But there is no way in hell, after forcing family incomes to go down more than $2,000 dollars during the Bush years, that working people and the middle class are going to fork over one dime to underwrite the next yacht purchase.

If they truly need the $700 billion they say they need, well, here is an easy way they can raise it:

 

a) Every couple who makes over a million dollars a year and every single taxpayer who makes over $500,000 a year will pay a 10% surcharge tax for five years. (It's the Senator Sanders plan. He's like Colonel Sanders, only he's out to fry the right chickens.) That means the rich will still be paying less income tax than when Carter was president. This will raise a total of $300 billion.

Like nearly every other democracy, charge a 0.25% tax on every stock transaction. This will raise more than $200 billion in a year.

c) Because every stockholder is a patriotic American, stockholders will forgo receiving a dividend check for one quarter and instead this money will go the treasury to help pay for the bailout.

d) 25% of major U.S. corporations currently pay NO federal income tax. Federal corporate tax revenues currently amount to 1.7% of the GDP compared to 5% in the 1950s. If we raise the corporate income tax back to the level of the 1950s, that gives us an extra $500 billion.

 

All of this combined should be enough to end the calamity. The rich will get to keep their mansions and their servants, and our United States government ("COUNTRY FIRST!") will have a little leftover to repair some roads, bridges and schools.

3. BAIL OUT THE PEOPLE LOSING THEIR HOMES, NOT THE PEOPLE WHO WILL BUILD AN EIGHTH HOME. There are 1.3 million homes in foreclosure right now. That is what is at the heart of this problem. So instead of giving the money to the banks as a gift, pay down each of these mortgages by $100,000. Force the banks to renegotiate the mortgage so the homeowner can pay on its current value. To insure that this help does no go to speculators and those who have tried to make money by flipping houses, this bailout is only for people's primary residence. And in return for the $100K paydown on the existing mortgage, the government gets to share in the holding of the mortgage so that it can get some of its money back. Thus, the total initial cost of fixing the mortgage crisis at its roots (instead of with the greedy lenders) is $150 billion, not $700 billion.

And let's set the record straight. People who have defaulted on their mortgages are not "bad risks." They are our fellow Americans, and all they wanted was what we all want and most of us still get: a home to call their own. But during the Bush years, millions of them lost the decent paying jobs they had. Six million fell into poverty. Seven million lost their health insurance. And every one of them saw their real wages go down by $2,000. Those who dare to look down on these Americans who got hit with one bad break after another should be ashamed. We are a better, stronger, safer and happier society when all of our citizens can afford to live in a home that they own.

4. IF YOUR BANK OR COMPANY GETS ANY OF OUR MONEY IN A "BAILOUT," THEN WE OWN YOU. Sorry, that's how it's done. If the bank gives me money so I can buy a house, the bank "owns" that house until I pay it all back -- with interest. Same deal for Wall Street. Whatever money you need to stay afloat, if our government considers you a safe risk -- and necessary for the good of the country -- then you can get a loan, but we will own you. If you default, we will sell you. This is how the Swedish government did it and it worked.

5. ALL REGULATIONS MUST BE RESTORED. THE REAGAN REVOLUTION IS DEAD. This catastrophe happened because we let the fox have the keys to the henhouse. In 1999, Phil Gramm authored a bill to remove all the regulations that governed Wall Street and our banking system. The bill passed and Clinton signed it. Here's what Sen. Phil Gramm, McCain's chief economic advisor, said at the bill signing:

 

"In the 1930s ... it was believed that government was the answer. It was believed that stability and growth came from government overriding the functioning of free markets.

"We are here today to repeal [that] because we have learned that government is not the answer. We have learned that freedom and competition are the answers. We have learned that we promote economic growth and we promote stability by having competition and freedom.

"I am proud to be here because this is an important bill; it is a deregulatory bill. I believe that that is the wave of the future, and I am awfully proud to have been a part of making it a reality."

 

This bill must be repealed. Bill Clinton can help by leading the effort for the repeal of the Gramm bill and the reinstating of even tougher regulations regarding our financial institutions. And when they're done with that, they can restore the regulations for the airlines, the inspection of our food, the oil industry, OSHA, and every other entity that affects our daily lives. All oversight provisions for any "bailout" must have enforcement monies attached to them and criminal penalties for all offenders.

6. IF IT'S TOO BIG TO FAIL, THEN THAT MEANS IT'S TOO BIG TO EXIST. Allowing the creation of these mega-mergers and not enforcing the monopoly and anti-trust laws has allowed a number of financial institutions and corporations to become so large, the very thought of their collapse means an even bigger collapse across the entire economy. No one or two companies should have this kind of power. The so-called "economic Pearl Harbor" can't happen when you have hundreds -- thousands -- of institutions where people have their money. When you have a dozen auto companies, if one goes belly-up, we don't face a national disaster. If you have three separately-owned daily newspapers in your town, then one media company can't call all the shots (I know... What am I thinking?! Who reads a paper anymore? Sure glad all those mergers and buyouts left us with a strong and free press!). Laws must be enacted to prevent companies from being so large and dominant that with one slingshot to the eye, the giant falls and dies. And no institution should be allowed to set up money schemes that no one can understand. If you can't explain it in two sentences, you shouldn't be taking anyone's money.

7. NO EXECUTIVE SHOULD BE PAID MORE THAN 40 TIMES THEIR AVERAGE EMPLOYEE, AND NO EXECUTIVE SHOULD RECEIVE ANY KIND OF "PARACHUTE" OTHER THAN THE VERY GENEROUS SALARY HE OR SHE MADE WHILE WORKING FOR THE COMPANY. In 1980, the average American CEO made 45 times what their employees made. By 2003, they were making 254 times what their workers made. After 8 years of Bush, they now make over 400 times what their average employee makes. How this can happen at publicly held companies is beyond reason. In Britain, the average CEO makes 28 times what their average employee makes. In Japan, it's only 17 times! The last I heard, the CEO of Toyota was living the high life in Tokyo. How does he do it on so little money? Seriously, this is an outrage. We have created the mess we're in by letting the people at the top become bloated beyond belief with millions of dollars. This has to stop. Not only should no executive who receives help out of this mess profit from it, but any executive who was in charge of running his company into the ground should be fired before the company receives any help.

8. STRENGTHEN THE FDIC AND MAKE IT A MODEL FOR PROTECTING NOT ONLY PEOPLE'S SAVINGS, BUT ALSO THEIR PENSIONS AND THEIR HOMES. Obama was correct yesterday to propose expanding FDIC protection of people's savings in their banks to $250,000. But this same sort of government insurance must be given to our nation's pension funds. People should never have to worry about whether or not the money they've put away for their old age will be there. This will mean strict government oversight of companies who manage their employees' funds -- or perhaps it means that the companies will have to turn over those funds and their management to the government. People's private retirement funds must also be protected, but perhaps it's time to consider not having one's retirement invested in the casino known as the stock market. Our government should have a solemn duty to guarantee that no one who grows old in this country has to worry about ending up destitute.

9. EVERYBODY NEEDS TO TAKE A DEEP BREATH, CALM DOWN, AND NOT LET FEAR RULE THE DAY. Turn off the TV! We are not in the Second Great Depression. The sky is not falling. Pundits and politicians are lying to us so fast and furious it's hard not to be affected by all the fear mongering. Even I, yesterday, wrote to you and repeated what I heard on the news, that the Dow had the biggest one day drop in its history. Well, that's true in terms of points, but its 7% drop came nowhere close to Black Monday in 1987 when the stock market in one day lost 23% of its value. In the '80s, 3,000 banks closed, but America didn't go out of business. These institutions have always had their ups and downs and eventually it works out. It has to, because the rich do not like their wealth being disrupted! They have a vested interest in calming things down and getting back into the Jacuzzi.

As crazy as things are right now, tens of thousands of people got a car loan this week. Thousands went to the bank and got a mortgage to buy a home. Students just back to college found banks more than happy to put them into hock for the next 15 years with a student loan. Life has gone on. Not a single person has lost any of their money if it's in a bank or a treasury note or a CD. And the most amazing thing is that the American public hasn't bought the scare campaign. The citizens didn't blink, and instead told Congress to take that bailout and shove it. THAT was impressive. Why didn't the population succumb to the fright-filled warnings from their president and his cronies? Well, you can only say 'Saddam has da bomb' so many times before the people realize you're a lying sack of shite. After eight long years, the nation is worn out and simply can't take it any longer.

10. CREATE A NATIONAL BANK, A "PEOPLE'S BANK." If we really are itching to print up a trillion dollars, instead of giving it to a few rich people, why don't we give it to ourselves? Now that we own Freddie and Fannie, why not set up a people's bank? One that can provide low-interest loans for all sorts of people who want to own a home, start a small business, go to school, come up with the cure for cancer or create the next great invention. And now that we own AIG, the country's largest insurance company, let's take the next step and provide health insurance for everyone. Medicare for all. It will save us so much money in the long run. And we won't be 12th on the life expectancy list. We'll be able to have a longer life, enjoying our government-protected pension, and living to see the day when the corporate criminals who caused so much misery are let out of prison so that we can help reacclimate them to civilian life -- a life with one nice home and a gas-free car that was invented with help from the People's Bank.

Yours,
Michael Moore
MMFlint@aol.com
MichaelMoore.com


Comments (Page 1)
7 Pages1 2 3  Last
on Oct 01, 2008

Nothing that hypocritical, anti freedom, do as I say, not as I do waste of human flesh matters.  The only thing he has proven is that even a self avowed socialist is better off living a capitalist lifestyle.

on Oct 02, 2008

If Michael sat down and spoke with someone who knows enough about what is really happening I think the list might end up being a lot shorter.

Whatever money you need to stay afloat, if our government considers you a safe risk -- and necessary for the good of the country -- then you can get a loan, but we will own you. If you default, we will sell you. This is how the Swedish government did it and it worked.

He obviouly talked to someone who knows the deal but he is so far to the left that he doen't realize how to fit this type of thing into our situation. Which if you look at what Paulson and Bernanke have done so far prior to the bailout proposal does reflect parts of what was done in Sweeden.

Its tough to trust anything that comes out of the mouth of Paulson since he has deep roots in Wall. St. but when you are dealing with a crisis that revolves around derivatives you really need someone who knows how they work and understands how the derivative market is broken.

 

He should stick to making movies. As radical as some of his views may be his movies are usually at least good for a few laughs.

 

on Oct 02, 2008

Michael Moore....LOL. 

on Oct 02, 2008

Like I say, both sides have their loons.  Only the left idolizes theirs.

on Oct 02, 2008

Mr. Moore is silly to think rich people got that way by frivolous spending. Also why does he think that all 400 of the richest Americans have an interest in the institutions that need to be bailed out? Just what the US needs Micheal Moore - Tax Auditor. I wonder if he sends the IRS a little extra on April 15th.

Isn't he some kind of hero in Canada?

on Oct 02, 2008

Isn't he some kind of hero in Canada?

Not really. We are more aware of our healthcare's failures than anyone. He's really propagandist in his attitude. His documentaries are usually seen as such, save a few points. Just because some of OUR loonies put him as "the Rebel of America" means that all the country is the same.

on Oct 02, 2008

The richest 400 Americans -- that's right, just four hundred people -- own MORE than the bottom 150 million Americans combined.

So there are 400 people who are much much richer than I. I fail to see how that is relevant to anything.

What am I supposed to do? Hate them?

 

on Oct 02, 2008

Moore? I don't trust all those in our Gov't who are suppose to be smart people, I am suppose to go this guys plan? Now this is comedy at it's finest.

I am curious about 1 thing though. Why is it that everyone always wants to bail out those people who bought houses they couldn't afford? Should they not get punished just as much as those who were greedy and tred to make a profit out of this dilemma we have today? Or does making mistakes and being punished for them only apply to people who can afford to lose a few bucks? I mean, why should they get to keep their houses and on top of that have around $100,000 of the value of the loan paid by someone else just because they were too stupid to avoid buying something they should have never bought in the first place?

on Oct 02, 2008

So there are 400 people who are much much richer than I. I fail to see how that is relevant to anythin

I am 32 years old and not once have I ever cared about any rich persons life or lifestyle. So why should I care that 400 people in the country have most of the money? Good for them, I can only wish I was # 401 I wanna be rich thru my own sweat and blood, not have the money handed over to me just because you care. It bugs me to see such comments about "400 rich people" as if somehow they got rich over night by somehow steeling the money from right under our noses and we simple did nothing to stop them.

I do find it ironic that people like Michael bitch about rich people, all while using the products these same people make and what made them rich. Kinda hipocritical if you aks me.

on Oct 02, 2008

I am curious about 1 thing though. Why is it that everyone always wants to bail out those people who bought houses they couldn't afford? Should they not get punished just as much as those who were greedy and tred to make a profit out of this dilemma we have today?

Ehh...

It's not those who bought house at a junk mortgage who will be bailet out

Nor is it the banks who allowed the mortgage who will be..

It's those who invested in the derivative product based on the mortgage. They didn't knew it was crap debt. But then again, they didn't really asked. They have done like any average stupid consumer, and told themselves "that's too good to be true" while never wondering. Yhea, they were stupid.

on Oct 02, 2008

Ah dumb people. They're always so amusing to watch rant.

If they truly need the $700 billion they say they need, well, here is an easy way they can raise it:

 

a) Every couple who makes over a million dollars a year and every single taxpayer who makes over $500,000 a year will pay a 10% surcharge tax for five years. (It's the Senator Sanders plan. He's like Colonel Sanders, only he's out to fry the right chickens.) That means the rich will still be paying less income tax than when Carter was president. This will raise a total of $300 billion. 

 Like nearly every other democracy, charge a 0.25% tax on every stock transaction. This will raise more than $200 billion in a year. 

c) Because every stockholder is a patriotic American, stockholders will forgo receiving a dividend check for one quarter and instead this money will go the treasury to help pay for the bailout. 

d) 25% of major U.S. corporations currently pay NO federal income tax. Federal corporate tax revenues currently amount to 1.7% of the GDP compared to 5% in the 1950s. If we raise the corporate income tax back to the level of the 1950s, that gives us an extra $500 billion.

a) So, now my family is supposed to pay for the bail out which we had nothing to do with the collapse.  The collapse occurred because of dead beat poor people who took out mortgages they couldn't afford. When the housing market collapsed, these people got foreclosed on and the banks and other related entities started sputtering.
If the top 400 richest people own more than the bottom 1.5 million, then all I can say is that those bottom 1.5 million much really suck.

Again, people who had nothing to do with the crisis are expected to disproportionately pay for it.  Maybe we should just take all our money out of the stock market, that woudl help right?
d) 25% of American companies pay no income taxes because they had no net income. You are taxed on profits.  You can raise the income tax to 99% and it wouldn't change this statistic.  This is why dumb people should not get involved in things they don't understand.
But what it would do is cause massive lay-offs.
I'm a greedy bastard. I accept Moore'e premise.  So you raise the taxes my company pays and you know what? I'm such a greedy bastard that I would just lay off non-critical employees so that my ridiculous standard of living is unaffected.
In other words, yea, us evil greedy scum still get all 7 houses but a lot of middle class people suddenly lose theirs because they lose jobs.

I just love watching pathetic class envy. Sure, it's okay if Oprah makes hundreds of millions a year. But a CEO making a fraction of that and the left freaks out. 



on Oct 02, 2008

It bugs me to see such comments about "400 rich people" as if somehow they got rich over night by somehow steeling the money from right under our noses and we simple did nothing to stop them.

I think it is quite probable that a large number of those 400 did, in fact, steal the money/wealth from others. But Moore is not referring to the thieves among those 400, but to the 400. He does not point out the crime they committed but simply points out their wealth.

There are also many among the poor who stole from us, I would go as far as claiming that perhaps most murderers and other violent criminals are among the poorest few million people in the US. Those violent poor, like the thieves among the rich, hurt society. But it would be irresponsible to point the finger at everyone but the top 400 and claim that they must be put in prison because some of them, perhaps even a large number of them, are violent criminals.

There are doshonest people among the rich and the poor. Being one of 400 who own more than everybody else does not prove that one deserves to be stolen from, and being one of the remaining population does not prove that one deserves to be executed for murder; even though some of the 400 did steal money and should give it back and even though some of the remaining population did commit violent crimes and should go to prison.

The trick is to avoid the fallacy of thinking that either wealth or poverty provide (or imply) dishonesty. Poor people are not violent criminals and the rich are not thieves. The categories might overlap, but they are not the same.

 

on Oct 02, 2008

The collapse occurred because of dead beat poor people who took out mortgages they couldn't afford.

That's the part I find so fascinating because those people are seen as the victims.

They took loans and promised they would pay them back.

They didn't pay the loans back.

That's why the banks collapsed.

_I_ have a good income but cannot buy a house because I cannot easily get a mortgage (I never saved much money). Why are the people who cannot afford mortgages but had a chance to get one _victims_ while I am not?

 

on Oct 02, 2008

That's the part I find so fascinating because those people are seen as the victims. They took loans and promised they would pay them back.

So, let's say a fellow who worked at Citigroup, (who's laid off thousands in the last year) or Ford, or GM, or was a real estate broker (they've been hard hit too) or any other number of reputable, well-appointed occupations was laid off. Maybe Hewlett Packard, they're getting rid of 24,000. Or, he could have worked at a car dealership. Folks are thinking 1 in 5 dealerships could go under this year. So, we have a fellow who used to be gainfully employed but no longer. Not only that, but the house that he'd purchased two years ago has fallen so much in value that the outstanding debt is now MORE than what they could ever hope to sell it for on the market.

Wait back up, remember this fellow's been laid off right? What if he gets a hernia? What if he cracks a tooth on a kernel of popcorn or slices his hand badly while cutting a tomato?

That's right, no medical coverage either!!!

So, we have a fellow who's worked hard his entire life. Paid his taxes, probably went to school too and has post secondary in a respected vocation. Puts in so many years at big company xyz, then gets laid off.

House is underwater (owe more than you'll ever get for it) No more employer medical so even though he's unemployed he has to consider splitting what little of his savings remain between

1) Mortgage

2) Food (has increased massively in the last year)

3) Health care

4) Utilities (has also increased massively in the last year)

5) Vehicle (gas costs have gone up!)

6) Credit card debt!!!!

That's right, the average U.S consumer is thousands of dollars in debt on credit cards. This is not a few bad apples, this is a majority of the working populace that is in debt. It's no longer "In God We Trust" it should be officially changed to "In Debt We Trust"

7) Anything and everything else in life that goes wrong. Blow a tire, spring a leak, shit the bed. Stuff happens, and in our society there's very little consumer goods that can be properly repaired (other than maybe your clothes) everything is throw away and buy a new one.

8) Other expenses- what if this fellow was doing renovations on his house before the market went to shit and spent 10 grand on upgrades? What just a few years ago was a sure bet on significant returns when flipping the house now is just another debt!

Sure, Joey can go out and get a job right away. Probably at Walmart, regardless let's say he's taken a huge drop on his income.

Sorry buddy, you fucked up. Sucks to be you, screw you, I got mine!!!

That seems to be the sentiment I'm getting out of all this. Meanwhile, you've got 400 people that have 1.6 trillion dollars between them.

The cost of this whole affair is going to be off-loaded onto the most struggling aspect of your economy, the consumer, who produces 70% of your GDP.

Wages have fallen vs inflation (your dollar buys less now) average consumer is tapped out with debt, throw in foreclosures and layoffs and huzzah!!!

You've suddenly got a lot of well-to hardworking folks who now have magically become "poor people who bit off more than they could chew"

on Oct 02, 2008

The collapse occurred because of dead beat poor people who took out mortgages they couldn't afford. When the housing market collapsed, these people got foreclosed on and the banks and other related entities started sputtering.

No, this collapse came because the banks took those mortgages and used turned them into "exotic debt instruments" that they then bought and sold on the market.

They took debt and magically turned it into profit, similar to what Enron did. In short, they lied.

The current collapse that we're seeing right now has FAR more to do with monkey business in the CDS market (credit default swaps) than it does with

"dead beat poor people who took out mortgages they couldn't afford"

The banks MASSIVELY over-leveraged their debts as collateral that they used to essentially create fake money that they invested in the market. This goes far beyond the simple to understand "lazy poor people!" excuse and into the machinery of the marketplace, and how it was twisted to create billions in profit in a very short amount of time for a very small amount of people, at the expense of everyone else.

This kind of ponzi scheme, however, can only last so long. Now that the house of cards is collapsing, it looks like the taxpayer is left holding the bag.

Do you know that most of this 700 billion bailout won't even go into your own economy? Most of it will go to foreign banks and funds that have ALREADY bailed out the banks months ago and are threatening to stop the purchase of U.S debt if their investment isn't protected. So, you're going to spend hundreds of billions that you don't have.... to make sure you can keep going into more debt..... hmmmm......

7 Pages1 2 3  Last